Skip to content


Mobile’s contribution to deal commerce: Relevance, relevance and relevance

Groupon is going public and providing some good basis for analysts to provide their insights. Wedbush’ Lou Kerner believes that what Groupon represents, Deal Commerce, is about to become as relevant for online commerce as AdSense was for monetizing online traffic.  Wedbush points to the amazing growth of Groupon and the industry in general, and goes as far as to claim that “… every major retailer and media company will need to have a Deal Commerce strategy and will be fighting for their share of the Deal Commerce revenue pie.”  But talk to people in the digital industry, and most will certainly have an opinion that they are simply not interested in deals because they are tired of being bombarded with them (certainly based on my small sample of 50+ people I have discussed the topic with), or that it only appeals to bargain hunters who are typically not the customers you want.  The problem – and solution, is all about relevance.  How do you provide relevance in deals in a way that will make this take off for the deal offerer?  Interestingly the mobile phone holds the key here.

1. Relevance in time and place

I may see a great deal about a Napa wine tour, but if I am not in the market for it right now, it is quickly forgotten. The deal needs to be relevant for me right now right here, and the mobile phone is the best tool to provide this information. Groupon has launched Groupon Now which uses your location as the basic premise for the deal being offered:

Using the basic premise that I am on the move, and that there are certain needs to be fulfilled by the merchants around me (food, entertainment, shopping) coupled with the time of day (i.e. do not offer me a breakfast deal at 5pm), should increase the chance of it being relevant and me taking the time to check it out.

2. Relevance in interests

Personalization has always been the mantra of online commerce, but few outside of players like Amazon have mastered it well. Recommendation engines and contextual engines are often simply too rudimentary (anyone say Genius music finder?) or prove to be too intrusive so people get turned off.  Outside of basic demographics though, one of the key data points for predicting likelihood to purchase something is based on your purchasing pattern. And this is where mobile payments hold the key. By knowing your spending pattern combined with your location and time of day, the likelihood of getting a deal right increases. I.e. whether I get a deal to Pizza Hut or Gordon Ramsey’s restaurant matters to my whole perception of bothering with deals.

In the deal commerce space, you will also increasingly see the emergence of niche focused deal players or “channels” as Wedbush points out. The problem for me as a user is navigating this space, as the niche I belong to is based on context and will vary over time. Context provided by my spending, location and time of day will help mitigate this (start-up idea: create a mobile niche aggregator app that does just this. You can mail me the check on IPO).

3. Relevance in value

Even if the deal is spot on for my interests, and potentially relevant for where I am, the benefits it provides to me needs to be really good in proportion to the discount I get, which are the two factors in the value equation.  Nowhere is this perhaps more evident than in the roll out of one of the premises for true local deal commerce to succeed – i.e. mobile payments. While the premise of mobile payments seem great, most consumers still do not see the value in using it, even in advanced markets like Japan:

So what can some of the drivers be for take-up for mobile payments? Using your mobile to pay for mass transit is one. If your mobile can help you save time on public transport in busy cities, you will surely start using it.  The benefits are very high, and the cost to consumer the same as paying with any other payment method – which translates into a high value.

Similarly, deal providers need to figure out how to not only address the price/cost saving side of the value equation but also the benefits, and it can take many shapes. A “gaming” element like short term deals, where proximity and being first matters will appeal to some, others may be driven by status, accomplishment, experiences, etc. The key is finding out what the triggers can be beyond just saving money, and getting data on the user is key, which again will be facilitated by mobile payments.

Then all that remains is solving the problems of repeat purchase…

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this post are mine and do not reflect the views of any clients or companies I am currently working for or have worked for.

Posted in Other, The Business of Mobile.

Tagged with , , , , .


Mobile and fragmentation: 3 key considerations for anyone wanting to offer a mobile service

Web vs app? iOS vs Android? This may seem like the main decisions you have to make when creating a mobile centric service, and some think that technologies like HTML5 will make this a lot easier. Think again. Fragmentation is an ever increasing problem for anyone wanting to develop a mobile service.  Not only are you looking at the “Battle of the OS’es”, but the number of connected devices with distinct characteristics are only increasing. While most developers will have made trade offs on smartphones vs feature phones, and some on smartphones vs tablets – how many have made trade offs between tablets and refrigerators? Sounds far fetched? Not really, as not only the number of connected devices grow – so do the choices of operating systems and implementations of those operating systems:

So how do you navigate this jungle of opportunities and trade offs?  What are some of the areas you need to focus on? The basic premise for my advice is that as anyone offering a service, you would want as wide of a distribution as possible with the lowest possible cost to obtain it.

1. Fragmentation of delivery channels: It’s not about web vs apps

A time trusted discussion item has been the app vs web debate. Will HTML5 save the day and become the standard platform?  The answer is a resounding NO!  Firstly, apps will always provide opportunities for a better user experience, by taking advantage of device specific characteristics, whether that is access to the camera or phone book, to NFC chips, device orientation, smart caching of key data to speed up user experience, using keyboard shortcuts – or a key feature now – the ability to charge for the service. Consumers love apps and when given a choice, tend to use the app platform rather than the web (for instance, how many times do you use the Facebook app vs the mobile site?) There will always be somewhat of a race where web will catch up, and apps pull away in terms of what you can and cannot do.

An often ignored issue at the moment is also the lackluster performance of the mobile web, which causes user frustration an abandonment:

If you are thinking that mobile networks will soon develop and be so fast and good that this will not be an issue, think again. Mobile network operators are facing a massive data crunch (as evidenced by Wedbush latest report) and mobile video usage is the main culprit:

When factoring in that only 9% of mobile users consume video regularly, yet that usage consumes 38% of the available bandwidth, you’ll quickly conclude that as more and more people get accustomed to watching mobile video (yes you will!), combined with general poor performance of mobile browsers, mobile web sites will hardly be suitable for services that require rich interaction and heavy data usage.

So does this mean you should focus exclusively on apps? No, you cannot ignore web – it really comes down to understanding user behavior and offer part of your service on web, and some as an app. This is addressed further in point # 3 below.

2. Fragmentation in applications: Develop a strategy for managing fragmentation

Developers not only have to deal with fragmentation across different device types and operating systems, but also have to deal with fragmentation within operating systems such as Android. In fact, according to Appcelerator, fragmentation within Android is seen as Android’s biggest problem. And despite Google wanting to reduce the fragmentation with the release of Ice Cream Sandwich (they surely must have fun in their marketing department at Mountain View), the strength of Android is also the amazing things you can do when customizing it. See for instance what KDDI in Japan has done to the UI:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S6NMH4ry-4&w=425&h=349]

And managing fragmentation on the devices are actually only part of the problem.  Fragmentation has multiple levels, and managing different skill sets is among the top concerns:

What you need to focus on is getting tools that allow you to easily manage code, so that the user experience and design has minimal variation, but does take advantage of each platform’s and each handset’s uniqueness.  Also, the same tools must allow you to manage your code base so you know which version of your software has been released for each device and where – and match that up with usage statistics so you know you are delivering the best experience across as many handsets as possible – to maximize your reach and potential.  It will be hard to get the best experts in multiple coding languages, but you may not have to if you employ the right tool set.

3. Understand your audience and maximize distribution

Long gone are the days when you can release an app on the app store and sit back and enjoy the number of downloads ticking in. And although Google and others make it easier to market your app, spending some of that user acquisition money on making sure you have maximize the touch points a user can have with your service is the best way to ensure an uplift in usage:

Even smartphone users may prefer interaction through SMS (for instance stock price alerts), mobile sites (get latest news on your favorite stocks) or applications (manage my stock portfolio). It all depends on the context. And whatever your service is, you need to understand the user context and provide the best possible interaction possibility with your service across whatever handset the user may have.

Posted in The Business of Mobile.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


mTrip: The power of mobile in one small package

It is not often I feel compelled to write about a specific mobile application, but after learning about mTrip, one word I was left with was simply WOW!  “Bleeding edge” features like Augmented Reality (AR) and location based services have often gotten a bad rap as there simply have not been a compelling user value propositions with either.   I believe mTrip will be one of the apps to contribute to changing this, although I have seen lots of cool LBS and AR apps, including a light switch selector app made by the good people over at monkeySac – but mTrips is really the most compelling app that appeals to a very wide user base. It is also well designed, and has key social embedded functionality that will help this become a popular app. The developers have also been clever in allowing offline usage, which is key as outrageous data roaming charges are continuing. What will be interesting to watch is when apps like these get embedded with payment and POS, as well as deals. Brands would kill for access to influence travelers like this.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1P4ptyOwR4&w=425&h=349]

This is close to my heart as well, as I worked on a similar project back in 2001 (which we called Integrated Mobile and Satelite Technologies – how is that for a brand name!) with The Mobile Media Company. This was long before AR was possible, thus we scrapped the project due to the costs.

What the real question is though, why is someone like mTrip the first to make this? Where is Lonely Planet or any of the other big travel content leaders?  Why are the big guys yet again asleep at the wheel?  I predict a lot of copy cats, but if mTrip executes well, their founders can look forward to a very bright future indeed…

Posted in Mobile Entertainment, The Business of Mobile.

Tagged with , , , , .