Skip to content


3 reasons why payments is the next big battle ground on your mobile

It is hard to avoid the massive industry push for mobile payments in the trade press currently. Companies in ecommerce like Amazon and Intuit, telecom operators like Sprint, and of course a whole host of financial services companies like Visa, and Amex, are making moves – and as expected Google who seem to have a hand in everything these days.  So why are they doing this?  The reasons go far beyond a clip of transactions.

1. A chance of capturing offline retail revenue

The basic reason, transaction revenue, is of course important. US card processing fees paid by merchants in 2009 totalled $62.1 bn, and mobile payments would extend this and presumably reduce cash transactions and possibly capture another $5 to $20 billion in processing revenue in 8 years time depending on the growth rate and devices capable of doing mobile payments (source: Nilson Report) . The technology and complexity involved in rolling out mobile payments means that non-financial players can interject themselves in the transaction stream as well, which intensifies the battle. Today, ecommerce stands at about 10% of retail revenue (in the US), and with mobile payments, digitally focused transaction players now stand to capture a massive offline retail market which, as an example, in the US stands at more than $4 trillion in revenue (Source: US Census Bureau).

2. Positioning to capture data, data, and more data

As any mobile network operator can tell you, they proudly hold a database of information that although it may not match that of Facebook, tells you a lot about people and their spending patterns. They know what phones you have owned, how often you call, how often you surf the web on your phone and where you are at any given point in time. Now you could argue that few mobile operators have managed to do much with this data, but some are starting to get it, and they certainly know the power of owning it. Any company who sits at the core infrastructure will at least be able to own all or part of spending patterns of consumers. This is of course massive, and hence why “data giants” like Google and even Facebook want to be involved in payments. Data can be captured at many points, and this is now become quite the battleground in many markets.

3. Playing the enabler role

In a survey by consulting firm Edgar, Dunn & Company, payment professionals across the globe were asked what the most important payment technologies were in the next 5 years:

As both 1 and 3 are related to paying with your mobile, it highlights how the industry sees mobile payments as such a key focus area. They are keenly aware that having the power of recognizing the consumer every time they make a payment coupled with the ability to communicate with that consumer before, during and after the point of purchase is extremely powerful. It will no doubt unleash a slew of innovative services designed to increase purchases, or consumer loyalty, unleash social shopping in the real world, all the while protecting the consumer interests. Having a position in the middle as an enabler allows you to understand what is going on, and potentially profit from the innovation of others – or allow you to stay on top of things in order to better your customer value propositions.

The future is so bright,…

Who will be winners and losers here?  Typical financial players certainly have more experience on the financial transaction end, and as many researcher point out, swiping is the easy part, and the new kids in town may find payments to be quite difficult.  The lack of standards and battle between different camps probably means that the full consumer adoption and roll-out will take longer than it would if this was for instance managed by central banks in each markets, but in the end, it will definitely be the consumers that stand out as winners, as a lot of what is convenient about online commerce now comes to a shop near you.  Benefits go far beyond quicker check-outs, as comparison shopping, offers, and personalized shopping experiences can get delivered to you once you enter or pass a store. There will be a period with a chicken and egg problem, but as handset with embedded payment technology roll-out, and merchants sign up, you will see nice adoption curves as those experienced (by seemingly always leading in mobile) Japan:

Of course, there are those that say what happens in markets like Japan do not necessarily transfer to the west. The graph below from Morgan Stanley should dis-spell that myth:

The future looks bright indeed….

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this post are mine and do not reflect the views of any clients or companies I am currently working for or have worked for.

Posted in The Business of Mobile.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


Are you ready for the second internet?

Wedbush just released a very interesting report on what they call “The Second Internet” aka The Social Internet (beats web x.0 as a term I suppose). Whether they succeed in being seen as the company that coined the term or not remains to be seen, but the main points they bring up are worth highlighting:

  • Social is embedded as the “DNA” of the company, i.e. they live and breathe social
  • Business models are disruptive – and mobile is a key component of the business models
  • Customers are in focus and contribute to the company’s value and receive a personalized experience, and
  • Platforms are open, and the companies are constantly innovating

Some of the strategies that the players that are considered leaders in this space make very much sense, in that social discovery leads to rapid adaptation. Wedbush points to social engagement as one of the keys for instance for Huffington Post to achieve mass adoption:

This is precisely what we used to advocate on my previous company, Storyz, where we had a platform that allowed for user interaction across social media (see Storyz Live! pitch example), similar to what CNN has done with iReport. The importance of social in discovery is highlighted by Facebook’s power in driving traffic:

A key point, which the report points out, putting a ‘Like’ button on your site does not make you a competitor among this generation of companies. This is about understanding user behavior, engaging with them, and making them your advocates. Easier said than done.  While I definitely believe Wedbush has highlighted some very innovative companies in this space, a lot of companies are trying to emulate portions of what they are doing. They may not be there yet, but whether we will see disruption at the scale of what we did in the “first internet” remains to be seen.

At some point though, you have to wonder about saturation. Wedbush points out that the amount of data now available on user behavior is massive, and likens it to a scene from the movie Posiedon Adventure, where a crew sees a massive wall of water coming and comparing it to the data being generated. I wonder if the amount of data companies now have to deal with can be likened to the amount of “social input” a person has to deal with. At some point I simply do not care if my friends (and using that term in the widest sense as most people do when using social media speak) have been awarded a new fish tank (I am past this point already), which cafes they are mayors of (anyone try checking into a coffee shop in Double Bay in Australia may think I am running for election), or even what newspaper articles they found offensive. There will no doubt be a need for an individual “social radio button” where the volume can be set from loud to low in a hurry. Now there’s a business idea.

 

Posted in Other, Social Media Marketing.

Tagged with , , , .


Facebook’s latest acquisition serves as a lesson to mobile app developers

Overshadowed by AT&T’s proposed takeover of T-Mobile, Facebook announced that they acquired mobile application developer Snaptu for a cool $70m.  Facebook’s CTO recently said in an interview when discussing prioritizing mobile platforms:

It’s incredibly challenging. You end up picking and choosing platforms even though your goal is to reach everyone

In this case, Facebook decided not to pick and choose, but to spend $70m to ensure complete device coverage.  Nice strategy, although it does not work for everyone that does not have a similar war chest. But what it does show that as an app developer, you simply cannot focus on one or two platforms to succeed. Yes it is hard to develop for multiple platforms, but that is what consumers expect now.  For instance, if you are a financial institution, that are seemingly going “app-crazy”, how will you explain to a BlackBerry customer that they can’t use your app while an iPhone user can?  It simply does not make sense.

Furthermore, you ignore the non-smartphone market at your peril. Your addressable market should be based on mobile data plan penetration, not smartphone penetration, as availability of data plans is key.

Research from Asymcoshows that there are 800 million developed country subscribers who have yet to upgrade to mobile broadband, and there are 3.5 billion(!) developing nations subscribers who do not yet have smartphones nor mobile broadband. Clearly, the opportunity will be huge, and you must keep in mind that feature phones are perfectly capable data phones, but it must be easy for users to get access, hence data plans are key. A good indicator to look at when determining a market’s attractiveness for your applications is to look whether data plans are offered to pre-paid users. That will indicate that mobile operators are serious about mobile data.  So start figuring out your porting and distribution strategy now, but don’t think you can follow Snaptu’s path to success, as only very few companies will pay that much for handset penetration on a few apps. The smart companies will soon figure out how to more easily support more handsets by using proper tools and having complete device support will certainly not cost $70m…

Posted in The Business of Mobile.

Tagged with , , , , , .